Aquatic Toxicity LC50: Difference between revisions

From ACD Percepta
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Kirilas (talk | contribs)
Kirilas (talk | contribs)
Line 64: Line 64:
The resulting models are highly accurate: LC50 values for aquatic species are predicted with RMSE of 0.5-0.6 log units when only predictions of moderate and high reliability (''RI'' >= 0.5) are considered .''RI'' values in the high and moderate ranges are commonly obtained for 30-60% of the validation sets. Validation results also show that the accuracy of predictions is proportional to the Reliability Index, as shown in the table below for LC50 to fishes (''P. promelas''):
The resulting models are highly accurate: LC50 values for aquatic species are predicted with RMSE of 0.5-0.6 log units when only predictions of moderate and high reliability (''RI'' >= 0.5) are considered .''RI'' values in the high and moderate ranges are commonly obtained for 30-60% of the validation sets. Validation results also show that the accuracy of predictions is proportional to the Reliability Index, as shown in the table below for LC50 to fishes (''P. promelas''):


{| cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" style="border-top:2px; border-bottom:2px"
{| cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" style="border-top:1px solid black; border-bottom:1px solid black"
|+ <b>Table 1.</b> ACD/LogS<sub>0</sub> model performance statistics for various fractions of the internal validation set.
|-
|-
! style="border-bottom:1px; background:#EAEAEA" width="150" | Subset  
! style="border-bottom:1px; background:#EAEAEA" width="150" | Subset  
Line 72: Line 71:
! style="border-bottom:1px; background:#EAEAEA" width="100" | <i>RMSE</i>
! style="border-bottom:1px; background:#EAEAEA" width="100" | <i>RMSE</i>
|-
|-
| align="center" height="60" | ''RI'' > 0.3
| align="center" | ''RI'' > 0.3


| align="center" |
| align="center" |
{| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="width:80%; height:40px"
{| cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" style="width:80%; height:40px"
| style="color:white; background:#B9CDE5" align="right" width="85.7%" | '''85.7%''' || style="background:#EDF2F9" width="14.3%" | &nbsp;
| style="background:#B9CDE5" align="right" width="85.7%" | '''85.7%''' || style="background:#EDF2F9" width="14.3%" | &nbsp;
|}
|}


| align="center" | 0.656 || align="center" | 0.797
| align="center" | 0.656 || align="center" | 0.797
|-
|-
| align="center" height="60" | ''RI'' > 0.5
| align="center" | ''RI'' > 0.5


| align="center" |
| align="center" |
{| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="width:80%; height:40px"
{| cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" style="width:80%; height:40px"
| style="color:white; background:#B9CDE5" align="right" width="59.4%" | '''59.4%''' || style="background:#EDF2F9" width="41.6%" | &nbsp;
| style="background:#B9CDE5" align="right" width="59.4%" | '''59.4%''' || style="background:#EDF2F9" width="41.6%" | &nbsp;
|}
|}


| align="center" | 0.795 || align="center" | 0.501
| align="center" | 0.795 || align="center" | 0.501
|-
|-
| align="center" height="60" | ''RI'' > 0.7
| align="center" | ''RI'' > 0.7


| align="center" |
| align="center" |
{| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="width:80%; height:40px"
{| cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" style="width:80%; height:40px"
| style="color:white; background:#B9CDE5" align="right" width="28.0%" | '''28.0%''' || style="background:#EDF2F9" width="72.0%" | &nbsp;
| style="background:#B9CDE5" align="right" width="28.0%" | '''28.0%''' || style="background:#EDF2F9" width="72.0%" | &nbsp;
|}
|}



Revision as of 09:53, 14 February 2013

Overview


Aquatic toxicity module provides the researcher with an accurate and reliable predictive tool that may serve as a valuable first estimate of fish and daphnid toxicity of new chemical entities that is required under REACH. It may therefore be used as an initial screen that could compete and become at least a partial replacement of time and resource consuming experimental determination in animals.


Features

  • A standard measure of aquatic toxicity is the concentration of the compound in water that is lethal to 50% of exposed organisms (LC50).
  • Provides the predictive models of LC50 (mg/L) for two species that are typically used in aquatic toxicity assays: Fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) and Water flea (Daphnia magna).
  • The calculated LC50 values are supported by reliability indices (RI) that provide an estimate of the prediction accuracy.
  • RI values represent a quantitative evaluation of prediction confidence. High RI shows that the calculated value is likely to be accurate, while low RI indicates that no similar compounds with consistent data are present in the training set.
  • The training sets used to build the models contain experimental data on aquatic toxicity for about 900 compounds in case of fathead minnows and about 600 compounds in case of water fleas.


Interface



  1. Calculations are presented in the form of a table. Each row contains dedicated "Configure" and "Train" buttons to select the training library for the particular species and to add new data to that library. Predictions are made for the two aquatic species most frequently used for testing - Fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) and Water fleas (Daphnia magna)
  2. The predicted value is LC50 of the analyzed compound for a given organism, expressed in mg/L.
  3. Predictions are supported by Reliability Index values ranging from 0 to 1 that serve as an intrinsic evaluation of prediction confidence:
    • RI < 0.3 – Not Reliable,
    • RI in range 0.3-0.5 – Bordeline Reliability,
    • RI in range 0.5-0.75 – Moderate Reliability,
    • RI >= 0.75 – High Reliability
  4. Up to five most similar compounds from the training set with names, CAS numbers and experimental LC50 values.
  5. Click the tab to browse the similar structures for different species.



Technical information